40 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
40 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
Harvey Birdman Rule
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
A nontrivial number of interesting collaborative FLOSS legal endeavors
|
|
have been operated in a relatively nontransparent and methodologically
|
|
suboptimal manner. The following norms of project participation are
|
|
designed to discourage this tendency. These norms shall be known
|
|
informally as the "Harvey Birdman Rule":
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Contributions in the form of word-processing documents (even if
|
|
in a free/open standard format), "redlined" or otherwise, are
|
|
unacceptable and will be deleted immediately.
|
|
|
|
2. No private mailing lists (including but not limited to those
|
|
governed by the so-called Chatham House Rule) will be used by
|
|
this project. Public archiving of mailing lists used by this
|
|
project is strongly encouraged; however, archives are not
|
|
mandatory and partial archiving is permitted.
|
|
|
|
3. Except in extraordinary cases, private telephone calls, private
|
|
teleconferences, private in-person meetings, and private email
|
|
communications shall not be used to discuss *substantive*
|
|
development of this project. Should such private communications
|
|
nevertheless occur, participants in such communications are
|
|
expected to publish summaries of any relevant discussions in a
|
|
manner or medium accessible to the general net public.
|
|
|
|
4. Contributing by informal suggestions or proposals made in a
|
|
posting to the project mailing list is welcome. However, any such
|
|
suggestions or proposals that are made in the form of top-posted
|
|
replies to quoted earlier mailing list postings by others are
|
|
unacceptable and therefore shall be ignored.
|
|
|
|
5. Criticisms of, or proposed changes to, the Harvey Birdman Rule
|
|
are welcome, though such criticisms or proposals must themselves
|
|
comply with the Harvey Birdman Rule as it exists at the time the
|
|
criticism or proposal is made.
|
|
|
|
|