Delete ws-supp.
I firmly believe there should be an AGPL-ish variant of copyleft-next. However, using language from AGPLv3 as placeholder seems of no value. I am convinced that drafting the supplementary license language that will be the AGPL-ish variant of copyleft-next requires starting from scratch.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3513a669b0
commit
57dfaa9d58
1 changed files with 0 additions and 22 deletions
|
|
@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
THIS IS A DRAFT. DO NOT USE AS A LICENSE.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
copyleft-next
|
|
||||||
Web Services Supplement
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This supplementary license document incorporates by reference the
|
|
||||||
terms and conditions of copyleft-next. If and only if We included
|
|
||||||
these supplementary terms along with the Received Work, they shall
|
|
||||||
apply to Covered Works. Inclusion of these terms in a Distributed
|
|
||||||
Covered Work is otherwise a "further restriction" in violation of
|
|
||||||
copyleft-next.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Therefore, these terms can only apply to the Received Work if the
|
|
||||||
initial licensor of the Received Work applied them.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If you create a Derived Work which supports remote interaction with
|
|
||||||
users through a computer network, your Derived Work must prominently
|
|
||||||
offer all such users an opportunity to receive its Corresponding
|
|
||||||
Source by providing access to the Corresponding Source from a network
|
|
||||||
server at no charge, through some standard or customary means of
|
|
||||||
facilitating copying of software.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue