Deleted Apache 2.0-style upstream indemnification compatibility clause.
GNU GPLv3 7f was added as a principled, nominally-license-neutral effort to achieve Apache License 2.0 compatibility (following the "discovery" that the upstream indemnification clause of the Apache License 2.0 could not be considered GPL-compatible based on any distillation of principle from FSF interpretive tradition). I now believe the more sensible approach, where a principled basis for GPL compatibility is in serious doubt based on interpretive tradition, is simply to designate privileged licenses and state that they are deemed compatible. This of course has the effect of rewarding relatively powerful or influential organzations/communities associated with the privileged licenses, which may be problematic. But this was the political reality behind the effort to create a principled formal basis for Apache 2.0 license compatibility in GNU GPLv3 anyway. This change is also motivated by concerns that GNU GPLv3 7f could have undesirable unintended consequences, though admittedly I have not encountered any in the past 5 years. There is continuing uncertainty (in my mind at least) over the degree to which indemnification clauses are consistent with normative understandings of free software, which supports the approach I am suggesting here. This change also has the effect of treating licenses very similar to the Apache License 2.0 differently from the Apache License 2.0. This can be justified on the basis of prevailing FLOSS policies against "license proliferation". With this change, the Apache License 2.0 is incompatible with GPL.next, but further changes will fix that.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e97c5c3766
commit
285684048a
1 changed files with 0 additions and 6 deletions
6
GPL.next
6
GPL.next
|
|
@ -289,12 +289,6 @@ that material) supplement the terms of this License with terms:
|
|||
e) Declining to grant rights under trademark law for use of some
|
||||
trade names, trademarks, or service marks; or
|
||||
|
||||
f) Requiring indemnification of licensors and authors of that
|
||||
material by anyone who distributes the material (or modified versions of
|
||||
it) with contractual assumptions of liability to the recipient, for
|
||||
any liability that these contractual assumptions directly impose on
|
||||
those licensors and authors.
|
||||
|
||||
All other non-permissive additional terms are considered "further
|
||||
restrictions" within the meaning of section 10. If the Program as You
|
||||
received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue